【新唐人2011年11月26日讯】政法大学副教授吴法天在微博暗指艾未未涉嫌非法集资罪，乐评人健崔也在网上回应想要“揍”他的信息，北京警方24号以威胁他人人身安全罪，对健崔实施拘留5天的处罚。法律界人士认为，警方违反行政执法比例原则。
警方通报说，这是北京警方破获首起网路威胁人身安全的案件。但官方的说辞和做法引起了网友们的极大不满。
北京知名律师莫少平表示，行政执法是有比例原则的。表露要打人本身这种意愿，虽然不妥当。但是对于这种表露，采取行政拘留作法值得讨论。
莫少平：“刑法执法的比例原则是什么呢？就是说他本身违反行政法规的一种违法行为，要和对他进行处罚的行政处罚应该是相适应。那么也就是说，不能他一个很轻微的一种行政违法行为，你就给他一个很重的行政处罚。这个也是违反行政执法的一个基本原则。所以，如果仅仅是这个网友是在网上表露这么一个意思，就给他行政拘留5天，这个我觉得是过重了。也就是违反了行政法的一个比例原则。”
“吴法天”本名吴丹红，最近一年来，他在互联网上十分活跃，有颇多出位的言论，因为频繁攻击有良知的媒体和媒体人、及知识份子、艺术家等，被网民称之为“高级五毛”。
吴丹红虽然企图隐瞒自己的真实身份，但因为网民的人肉搜索不再隐瞒，而在新浪微博上以中国政法大学副教授的身份加以认证。
莫少平：“当然，我也是了解一点，像吴法天等人在网路上发表的一些言论，最起码我认为是不够负责任的。他有些言论可能对事实，就应该说是什么呢？不讲基本的事实。甚至还有一些攻击。人身攻击的这种语词，那么这种作法的本身这个也应该说是不对的。”
律师何辉新认为，吴法天打着政法大学副教授的幌子，曲解法律，随意编造法律构陷公民！
而健崔在网上说：“我特别想去打他致其双手残疾，无法再混淆视听，让他知道自己到底是谁。”
对于健崔被拘留，“六四天网”创办人黄琦认为，警方是有选择性执法。
黄琦：“同样的网路，语言恐吓事件，依然对民间社会进行威胁恐吓的部分人士，也未受到任何追究。同时我们所提供服务的很多网民，在向警方举报政府人员，警察，以及维稳人员对他们进行殴打和威胁后，就被警方抓捕入狱。可以说中国警方选择性执法的现象，在这个事件中暴露无遗。”
黄琦认为，每个公民的言论自由权利，都应受到法律保护。任何公民都有在各个平台上，发表自己对公共事务意见的权利。也不应该因此受到来自任何政治势力的打压。
新唐人记者 李韵 唐睿 李若琳 采访报导
Challenge Hack Writer Online, Jian Cui was Arrested in China
Wu Fatian, Associate Professor of China University of
Politics, via micro-blog,said Ai Weiwei is suspected of illegal fund-raising.
In response, Jian Cui, a musician commentator, replied online
that he wants to beat Wu.
Then Beijing Police arrested Jian Cui and charged him with
threatening others’ safety on November 24th, and will detain him for 5 days.
Legal professionals comment, that the police violated the
principle of administrative law enforcement.
Beijing police announced that this is their first case that
relates to online personal safety being threatened.
But netizens are great dissatisfied with the official rhetoric
and action.
Mo Shaoping, the famous Beijing lawyer, said that
there’s proportional principle in law enforcement.
Although it’s not right to express the intention to beat
someone, administrative detention is something that needs to be discussed.
Mo Shaoping: ”What’s the proportional principle in
law enforcement? The administrative punishment should be proportional to the crime.
Which also means that a criminal with a light crime can’t be
punished with a heavy punishment. This is a basic principle.
So, a netizen expressed opinion online, “you punished him
with 5 days’ detention!
I think it’s too much, it violates the proportional principle.”
Wu Fatian’s real name is Wu Danhong. In recent years,
he was very active on internet, and made many controversial remarks,
which attacked the conscience media, the intellectuals, artists, and so on.
He was named ”senior *fifty cents” by netizens.
**（fifty cents is a special group of people in China.
They are hired by the government, and earn fifty cents for each
pro-government comment they send out in BBS, blog, etc.
So far, there may be hundreds of thousands of Fifty Cents in China）
Wu Danhong attempted to conceal his real identity,
but finally he admitted that he is the Associate Processor
in China University of Politics on Sina microblog because
he was afraid of the netizens’ investment power.
Mo Shaoping:”Of course, I also know something.
Like Wu Fatian, those people aren’t responsible to publish some comments online.
Some of their comments were not the basic truth.
Even some of them are attacks. The personal attacks are wrong.”
Lawyer He Huixin said that Wu Fatian uses the title of
Associate Professor of Politics to misinterpret the law, and create a law in order to frame citizens.
Jian Cui, a musician commentator said online:”I particularly
want to beat Wu Fatian, to disable his hands,
so he can no longer mislead the public,
as well as let him know who he is.”
Huang Qi, founder of “June Fourth Skynet”,
said the detention of Jian Cui showed that the police are using selective enforcement.
Huang Qi: ”On the same internet, many people aren’t taking
any accountability, they are even always threatening the civil society.
But there’s many netizens we served, who were arrested by
police when they told police that they were beaten,
they were threatened by government officials,
police and security officials.
I can say this case shows the selective enforcement by
Chinese police.”
Huang Qi thought, each citizen should have the right to
express their opinion freely, and this right should be protected by law.
Every citizen should have right to comment on public affairs,
and should not be pressured by any political power.
NTD Reporters: Li Yun, Tang Rui and Li Ruilin
