【新唐人2011年11月12日讯】《大方》杂志在发行两期之后，正式宣布“被停刊”，对此，韩寒在他的个人部落格发表文章，纪念自己出刊一期被停的《独唱团》以及出版两期被停的《大方》，他再次批评中共的文化审核制度，不过，这篇文章在网路发表没多久，就被当局给和谐了。
《大方》的官方微博上发布了一则“敬告”启事：“11月1日接通知，《大方》不得再出版。”
有人认为停刊的原因，可能是由于《大方》“以书代刊” 而遭到制裁。《大方》编委之一止庵表示，不排除这种可能性，他说，《大方》定位为多元文集，从没说过这是一本杂志，如何界定“以书代刊”和“多元文集”的区别，相关单位并没有明文规定。
网友“半夏苏叶”感叹的说，我不明白凭什么越是有价值的杂志如《大方》如《独唱团》都不能好好的出下去呢。难道稍有文学意义的就只有被停刊的命运?
网友“台东镇”说，所有的自由思想与表达管道都堵塞掉。还有网友说，“社会主义文化大发展大繁荣，意味着对文化更加严酷的管制。”
有一段时间没有在部落格发文的韩寒，发表文章说，在中国只有拥有书号才能出版，只有出版社才能发书号，只有官方才能有出版社，所以从源头上，自由的出版其实是不可能的。
韩寒说，自己从第一本书《三重门》到被停刊的《独唱团》，到现在，每次在网路发表文章，隔日就不见，真的很扫兴。
《大方》编委之一的叶美瑶说：台湾出版人会觉得不可思议，当局面对这份初刊就号称发行百万的刊物，不谈内容不谈思想，祭出不得以书代刊的法令，北京出版人了然得连生气都没有！也因此我格外欣赏韩寒，他至少在这样的体制下还能生气。
韩寒的文章被删除后，还是不影响网友在上面留言，不明白的网友问：为什么看不到文字啊？另一名网友马上说：被删除了。许多网友生气的回应，有没有搞错，又被河蟹掉了。
这篇被删除的文章吸引了将近64万人次，成功转载四千多次，网友“普兰可”还做了”抗和谐备份”， 他不认识韩寒，无法请求转载许可，但他希望文章不要“被消失”，让网友在网路上找的到这篇文章，让真相不要被掩盖。
今年初曾被媒体广泛报导的“杂志书创办热潮”，已经开始出现了隐患。这些青春杂志要想获得刊号，除了言论需符合当局的格调之外，不排除和出版集团的后台“能力”有关。
台湾《新经典文化》总编辑叶美瑶在脸书上写着：我很难爱中国这个出版时代。资深出版人傅月庵说：这是一个逼人拉关系、走后门，按潜规则办事的国家。
韩寒也说，我不知道一个文化人提笔就哆嗦的国家怎么能建设成文化强国，一个因为要避讳常委所以在谷歌上搜索不到李白的国家，怎么能建设成文化强国。
新唐人记者黄容综合报导。
“Generous” magazine was forced to stop publication
“Generous” magazine made a formal announcement of
“forced stopping of publication”, after publishing two issues.
To commemorate his “Solo Group”, which was ordered to
stop after publishing one issue, and “Generous” magazine,
renowned writer Han Han posted a blog article criticizing
the censorship system of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
However, the article was soon “harmonized“ by the CCP.
Generous magazine posted a notice on its official website,
advising,
“An instruction on November 1 ordered Generous
to stop publication."
Some people think that Generous’ publication being stopped
may have been because it issued journal with a book number (ISBN) thereby incurring sanction.
Member of the Editorial Board, Zhi’an, said that
this possibility had not been ruled out.
But Generous was defined as an edition of diversified anthology,
and never alleged to be a magazine.
How are “issuing publication with book number" and
“edition of diversified anthology" defined?
the official department concerned has never expressly
specified the difference between two.
Netizen Banxia Suye sighed, I just do not know
why the more valuable magazines such as Generous, and Solo Group, cannot be allowed to publish?
Don’t tell me the magazines with a little literary significance
can only have a suspended fate.
Netizen Taidong Town said in a posting,
that all the channels of free thinking and expression are blocked.
Another netizen commented, “the great development and
prosperity of socialist culture" means that culture is controlled more severely.
Han Han, a renowned writer, said in his blog post,
In China, a publication can be made only with a book number,
but only the publishing house are eligible to issue the book number,
while the authorities are the only owner of the publishing house.
So, from the source, free publication is in fact not possible.
Han Han said that from his first book, Triple Gate, to
the suspended magazine Solo Group,
and even up until to now, every article published online
would disappear the next day. It was really disappointing.
Yemei Yao, a member of Editorial Board of Generous, said
Taiwan publishers would feel it incredible that
the authorities had officially ordered suspension of
such a publication with millions of the first issue sold,
regardless of it’s content and thinking,
but the Beijing publisher, to my surprise, did not get angry!
That’s why I particularly appreciate Han Han,
under such a political system, he can at least get angry.
After Han Han’s article was deleted, netizens left messages.
A confused netizen asked why couldn’t I see the text?
Another netizen replied right away that It had been deleted.
Many netizens responded angrily:
The article was again river-crabbed. (Homophone of harmonized)
Han’s deleted article has attracted nearly 64 million hits,
and has been successfully reproduced over 4,000 times.
Netizen Pulanke even made an “anti-harmony backup".
As he does not know Han Han, he cannot apply for reproduction permission.
So he hopes the article will not suffer a “forced disappearance”,
letting netizens find the article online, and allowing the truth to not be concealed.
Earlier, in 2011, a tidal wave of magazine and book
founders, with extensive media coverage, emerged potential problems.
To get a serial number (ISSN), these youth magazines have
to remain consistent with the authorities’ tone.
It does not rule out the links to “the capability” of
behind-the-scene supporters of the publishing group.
Taiwan’s New Classical Culture chief editor, Yemei Yao,
posted in the face book, I feel it is difficult to love the era of publishing in today’s China.
Fu Yue’an, a veteran publisher said,
“This is a country that compels people to
establish underhanded connection,
to pull strings, to handle matters following hidden rules.
Han Han wrote online, I do not know how such a country,
in which a civilized person shakes with fear when writing articles, can be built into a cultural power?
A country that makes a taboo of the phrase “standing committee”,
can block online searches for Li Bai. (China’s most renowned poet)
How can it become a cultural power?
NTD reporter Huang Rong
