【新唐人2011年6月9日讯】在中国引发极大民愤的杀人犯药家鑫最近被处死。这个本来并不复杂的案件，牵动了整个网络、媒体与社会，为药家鑫开脱罪责的声音更是不断出现，让民间不时担忧：法律再次被践踏。而这次顺应民意处决药家鑫，再一次引来各方舆论对这个案件的探讨，其中也不乏“阴谋论”之说。 我们下面来看看报导。
药家鑫是西安音乐学院钢琴系的学生，去年（2010年）10月份，他开着私家车撞伤26岁的女工张妙。药家鑫不但不送张妙到医院治疗，反而对张妙连刺八刀致死，逃逸过程中又撞伤两人。
今年4月20号，西安中级法院作出一审判决，以故意杀人罪判处药家鑫死刑；陕西省高院5月20号驳回药家鑫上诉，维持原判，并报请最高法院核准。最高法院复核后，6月7号药家鑫在西安被执行死刑。
药家鑫杀人案发生后，因为他的犯罪动机极其卑劣、手段特别残忍，而引发民众和社会舆论的极大关注。但在群情激愤的声讨中，官方电视台央视和其他一些媒体，却对药家鑫进行了一系列偏袒报导，中国人民公安大学犯罪心理学教授李玫瑾更是在电视上语出惊人，指药家鑫连杀八刀是他弹琴养成的“强迫性动作”。
官方极力为药家鑫开脱，使“药家鑫该不该被判死刑”的问题，一度成为疑问。
如今伴随着药家鑫的被处决，各界有多方的猜测、探讨与反思。
昝爱宗（前国家海洋报记者）：“这样的事件发生太不幸了， 人要能通过这样的事情能反思一下，能给活着的人一种启示，要珍惜生命、尊重每一个生命。”
《美国之音》报导则认为，在网络等媒体的监督之下，中共当局再也无法坐视网民的力量，药家鑫案件体现平民获得了胜利。
另有舆论认为，药家鑫的死，其实是一场官方布下的“阴谋”。网络上有一篇名为《药家鑫案最后的胜利者出人意料》的文章，作者认为，药家鑫案如此火热的原因是：药家鑫的背后有一个实力强大的“公关团队”，而这个“公关团队”的目地，却不是像表面所表现的—— 为药家鑫免死，而是要在掀起一轮轮高潮、吊足民众的胃口之后，再让药家鑫“顺应民意”曲折而艰难的死去。从而让老百姓天真的以为中国的法律真的是不畏强权的，是公正的，进而烘托出中共的“伟光正”。文章还说，这是中共一贯以来的常用手法。
回顾药家鑫案件死刑核准的过程中，官方《国际在线》发表评论说，“民意不能成为判处药家鑫死刑的依据。”
不仅仅是官方媒体为药家鑫说话，西安也有五位教授联名发表一封公开信，呼吁法院“刀下留人”。
这一系列为药家鑫免判死刑而进行的大力造势，再加上6月7号央视非常即时的评论:“药家鑫案审判彰显司法公正”，不免让人相信，药家鑫背后强大的“公关团队”的存在。
新唐人记者黄丽达、李谦、朱娣综合报导。
Public Will Or PR Conspiracy?
Yao Jiaxin, a murderer who infuriated the public,
was sentenced to death and said to be executed.
His case has involved both the media and society.
Some defend him, while others worry
about laws being disregarded. As Yao’s sentence
seems to follow the will of the public,
some see this process as more of a “conspiracy.”
Yao Jiaxin, student at Xi an Music Conservatory,
hit a woman with his car last October and
instead of calling an ambulance,
Yao stabbed the woman 8 times, killing her.
Escaping the scene, Yao injured two more people.
This April, Xi an municipal court sentenced
Yao Jiaxin to death for intentional homicide.
Yao’s appeal was overturned by the Shaanxi
Supreme Court, and the Chinese Supreme Court
approved the death sentence.
Yao’s execution was announced on June 7.
Yao Jiaxin’s cruelty has drawn wide attention.
Amidst public anger however, official media
put out a series of reports defending Yao.
Li Meijin, a criminal psychologist
from Xi an Public Security University,
said Yao’s knife attack on the hit victim
was an “involuntary reaction.”.
Official media tried to instill doubts in the public
whether Yao should receive the death penalty.
Now when Yao’s death sentence is executed,
many ponder about this incident.
Zai Aimin (former reporter): “This case is so sad
and people should reflect on its meaning;
we must treasure and respect each and every life.”
Radio Voice of America said that with media
and the Internet, the Chinese Communist Party
(CCP) cannot neglect the power of netizens;
and Yao’s sentence is victory of the people.
Others see Yao’s case as a regime’s “conspiracy.”
A blog article on Yao’s “surprise sentencing” said
that a professional PR team is behind Yao’s case.
The PR goal was hidden. It defended Yao,
so people’s interest in the case would rise,
and this would highlight Yao’s final sentence
as a hard process of “following public opinion.”
People would see that the law is fair
and the CCP is great and right.
During Yao’s case, the official CRI Online wrote:
“public opinion can’t be base of Yao’s sentencing.”
Not only did official media defend Yao,
five Xi an professors also asked for leniency.
After the media campaign in Yao’s defense,
Central Chinese TV commented,
“Yao’s case reflects the just legal procedures.”
For some, the motive of the official PR is clear.
NTD reporters Huang Lida , Li Qian and Zhu Di
