【新唐人2014年10月16日訊】佔中行動已經持續近三週，作為佔中主體的香港學生也成為了世界關注的焦點。但與全球多數媒體正面報導不同的是，中共的喉舌媒體對香港學生展開了極為猛烈的輿論討伐。儘管多數港人沒有受到輿論宣傳的影響，但有民眾擔心，一旦當局發現輿論攻擊無效，恐怕會採取暴力鎮壓。
自香港的真普選在中共人大的決議下變得無望之後，憤怒而失望的香港學生率先站出抗議，發起罷課行動，隨即抗議隊伍迅速擴大，越來越多的香港市民加入。如果說在初期，中共當局還沒有將香港學生的「小打小鬧」放在眼裡，那麼後來，形勢可以說完全脫離了當局的掌控——香港學生成了佔中的主體，受到世界媒體關注。
於是，中共媒體又一次顯現出了它的「步調一致，口徑一致，語調一致」的特點，中共央視、黨媒《人民日報》、《環球時報》，以及親共港媒《大公報》、《文匯報》開足了馬力，對學生持續猛烈攻擊，各大門戶網站緊跟其後，內容五花八門。
先是《人民日報》海外版，在9月5號以《青春懵懂有熱血 被當槍使不自知 被街頭政治裹挾的香港學生》為題，指責香港學生「連政改是怎麼回事都沒搞清」，「糊里糊塗被當槍使」。
香港城市大學政治學講座教授鄭宇碩：「大家自身是香港人，大家的眼睛也是雪亮的，看得很清楚，就是你中共不給我們真正的政治的權利，想把香港變成中國大陸裡頭一個普普通通的大城市。大家不願意當順民，大家出來發聲音。因為大家知道今天不出來發聲，以後不知道還有沒有機會，大家要跑出來保衛自己的核心價值，自己的生活方式，自己的尊嚴。都是年輕人自發的參加。」
此外，喉舌媒體們對於香港學生的組織者也格外的「情有獨鍾」，不但指稱香港專上學生聯會和學民思潮「有錢、有後臺」，學聯反對派有「黑幕」，而且還抹黑學聯領袖周永康是「臺獨」、「港獨」，學運領袖黃之峰是「美國特務」等。就連中共一貫採用的「西方顛覆論」、「境外陰謀論」也再次被拋出。
對此，持中立立場的大陸法律界人士表示，先不論中共媒體宣傳的內容真與假，單就當局針對學生組織者的一系列指控，就有涉嫌「媒體煽動」的味道，不但邏輯混亂，而且空口無憑。
中國律師觀察網總編趙國君：「我認為《文匯報》也好，還有《人民日報》海外版也好都太武斷了，不負責任。如果說指控別人受外國指使，這是一種文學化描述的語言。如果按照法律證據來說，你得指出證據——他是否犯有間諜罪？是否有投敵行為？這都是法律上應該有嚴格定義的。但是如果說真的有這樣的指控，該有嚴格的證據，不能妄斷。所以我覺得官方指控涉嫌輕率，有點媒體化煽動的味道。」
而對於大多數港民來說，黨媒針對「學聯」、「學運」領袖的指控，就像「罵街小報」的氣勢。
鄭宇碩：「這當然是中共一貫的手法。不過，目前這一類的抹黑行動就大量的升級。大家當然也不相信，大家看得很清楚，這個佔中行動的參與者都是自發的，他們事實上也不接受任何組織的領導等。你怎麼抹黑一兩個年輕的學生、學運領袖，是沒有用的。」
對於香港民眾的「不買賬」，中共當局對於香港大學生輿論攻擊的勢頭已經有所減弱，但經歷過歷次運動的民眾擔心，這有可能是風暴前的「平靜」。中共一向的做法是：當謊言不足以「維穩」時，暴力和恐怖就將登場。
採訪/秦雪 編輯/張天宇 後製/葛雷
Vindictive CCP Trash Media Defaming HK Student Leaders
Three weeks have passed since the Occupy Central
movement began.
At the leading edge of the movement, Hong Kong students
have drawn attention from global media.
In sharp contrast to most international media, the Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) mouthpieces keep striking at student
protesters in an extreme vicious manner.
However most Hong Kong people are not moved by such
propaganda trash.
However, some worry that the CCP may use violence to
suppress the students once they find that the media assaults
do not work.
After the CCP’s NPC issued a statement that refuses universal
suffrage in Hong Kong, HK students were amongst the first
ones to protested against the decision.
They started the strike, which was then joined by an ever
increasing number of HK civilians.
Initially, the CCP might not have taken the HK students strike
very seriously.
However, they quickly lost control of the situation.
As the leading group of the Occupy Central movement,
HK students became the focus of global media.
In such a situation, CCP mouthpieces again showed the world
how they “act, speak and conspire" in concert with the party.
CCTV, People’s Daily, Global times and pro-CCP HK media
such as Ta Kung Pao and Wen Wei Po have spared no efforts
in attacking student protesters.
Major portal websites in mainland China have also followed
closely, by releasing all kinds of scandalous articles to defame HK
students.
On Sept. 5, People’s Daily started the shameful attacks with an
article titled:
“Too Young and Warm-Blood, HK Students Don’t Know
They Are Being Used and Coerced by Street Politics."
The article sneered that HK students “don’t even know
what a political reform is like" and “are being used
as a political weapon".
Yu-shek Cheng, professor of political science at City
University of Hong Kong:
“We live in Hong Kong and we know clearly that the CCP
does not give us real political rights.
They attempt to turn Hong Kong into a place
similar to all other big cities in mainland China.
We don’t want to accept that and therefore stand out
to let our voices be heard.
We know that if we don’t speak out today, maybe we won’t
have a second chance to do that.
We go to streets to protect our core values and life style,
as well as our dignity. Those young people mostly
joined the movement voluntarily."
Furthermore, CCP mouthpieces have shown
“special interest" in the organization of HK student groups.
They claimed that the HK Federation of Students (HKFS)
and Scholarism are “financially and political" supported
and there are “inside storie" behind the scenes.
They also defamed HKFS secretary-general Chow Yong-kang
as a “supporter of Taiwan and HK independence".
Another student leader Joshua Wong was also reported
as a “U.S. spy".
As usual, the CCP again attributed the movement to so-called
“foreign forces" that attempt to overturn the CCP.
Being neutral on what occurred in Hong Kong, a Chinese
legal professional said that:
regardless of whether what the CCP mouthpieces said is true
or false, its attacks against the HK student leader sounds like
media incitement.
Those reports are badly organized and illogical, and lack
evidences to support what they said.
Zhao Guojun, chief-editor of Chinese Lawyer Watcher
(ccwlawyer.com):
“I think Wen Wei Po or People’s Daily are too assertive in
making conclusions and those are irresponsible remarks.
Saying someone is incited by foreign forces to do something
is descriptive language used in literatures.
Legally, you need to present evidences to prove
he committed the crime of espionage or surrendered
to the enemy.
There are strict legal definitions of those acts.
So evidences needs to be presented in order to
make serious charges like that.
For this reason, I think those official reports are too hasty,
making them sound like media incitement."
For most HKers, what CCP mouthpieces said against the student
leaders sound like tabloid trash.
Yu-shek Cheng:"Of course the CCP has always been
playing tricks like that.
Currently they are just trying harder than usual
to throw mud at others.
We don’t believe what they say as we clearly see that
people joined Occupy Central movement of their own will.
They are not led by any group. So it is useless discrediting
one or two student leaders, no matter how hard they try."
The CCP’s media attacks have abated as they have little
effect on Hong Kong residents.
On the other hand, those experiencing CCP’s political
movements begin to worry that this may only be
the peace ahead of a storm.
In the past, the CCP would use violence and terror
when lies were not enough to “maintain stability"
of its regime.
Interview/QinXue edit/Zhang Tianyu post-production/GeLei
