【禁聞】「微信十條」後 中共大批抓人

【新唐人2014年08月11日訊】「微信十條」後 中共大批抓人

中共最近開始新一輪打擊網路言論行動,8月7號發佈所謂「微信十條」後,開始大批抓人。

據中共喉舌《新華網》8月9號報導,目前已經有85人因為網路言論被指造謠,而遭到刑事拘留、行政拘留或警告,還有16家網站被查。

大陸民眾對這個消息議論紛紛。北京作家劉京生則向《自由亞洲電臺》表示,大陸網民與中共官方的博弈時代已經到來。

8月7日,中共「國家網路信息辦公室」發佈的所謂「微信十條」,規定:非新聞單位的公眾號不得發佈、轉發時政新聞﹔註冊帳號時須承諾遵守所謂社會主義制度等。

孔子學院官員偷竊和審查學術材料

在海外廣受批評的中共「孔子學院」,最近再出醜聞,「歐洲中國研究協會」8月1號發表報告說,中共「孔子學院」官員,上個月在葡萄牙舉行會議時,「偷竊和審查會議的學術材料」。

美國《華爾街日報》8月7號引述這份報告的內容報導說,引起風波的是中共「孔子學院」總部總幹事、「國家漢語國際推廣領導小組辦公室」主任許琳

據報導,許琳所在的機構出錢承辦了這次會議,許琳認定,參加會議的一些教授的論文「有違中共的規定」,而會議議程表上出現的「蔣經國基金」的名字,也讓她覺得不能接受,於是「下令立刻弄走會議場所的所有材料」。兩天之後,她發還的材料,撕去了這些她不喜歡的內容。

報導說,「歐洲中國研究學會」主席、瑞典「隆德大學東方與東南亞研究中心」主任Roger Greatrex對許的行為大表不滿,他下令重印被撕去的內容,並指出「如此干預一個獨立而又民主的非盈利學術團體所辦的國際性會議,是完全不能接受的。」

《華爾街日報》評論說,這樣的行為,在全球120個國家的1100所「孔子學院」,經常出現。報導還特別引用中共政治局常委李長春的講話說:「孔子學院」是中共海外宣傳的一個重要部分。

《華爾街日報》建議設有「孔子學院」的美國大學的校長們,好好研讀「歐洲中國研究協會」的這份報告,然後公開解釋為甚麼「孔子學院」還需要存在。

「追查國際」曝光迫害高智晟責任者

大陸著名維權律師高智晟,雖然日前已經被釋放出獄,但並沒有獲得真正自由,目前仍然被中共警方嚴密監控,不能與外界聯絡。

8月9號,總部設在紐約的「追查迫害法輪功國際組織」,公布了部分參與迫害高智晟律師的責任單位和責任人名單,並要求中共當局立即恢復高智晟律師人身自由。

「追查國際」希望知情者揭露更多的相關個人和單位,最終將這些侵犯人權者繩之以法。

編輯/周玉林

Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Arrests Large Numbers
Under Ten Rules of WeChat

CCP recently started a new round of online speech
combat.
They start to arrest after release of so-called 10 rules of WeChat
on August 7.

According to CCP mouthpiece Xinhua News Agency’s
report of August 9, 85 people were detained or warned due to
spread of rumors online.

16 websites are under investigation.

Mainland people all talk about the news.

Beijing writer Liu Jingsheng told Radio Free Asia that the
mainland netizens and the CCP officials have started.

August 7, the so-called CCP ten rules of WeChat said,
political news can’t be reprinted or published by non press
organizations. You have to promise to comply with the
so-called socialist system.

Confucius Institute Officials Steal and Changed Academic Material

There is another scandal from widely criticized overseas CCP
Confucius Institute.

August 1, the European Association for Chinese Studies (EACS)
reported that the CCP Confucius Institute officials stole and
altered academic material from last month’s Conference
in Portugal.

August 7, US Wall Street Journal quoted the report,
the CCP Confucius Institute General Headquarters Director-General,
Chinese National Office for Teaching Chinese as a Foreign
Language director Xu Lin caused the problem.

It’s said the institution Xu Lin belongs to hosted this conference.

Xu Lin found that some attending professors’ papers infringe the
CCP rules; the name of Chiang Ching-kuo Fund cannot be accepted.

She immediately ordered all documents be taken from the conference.

Two days later, she returned the material after ripping out parts
she did not like.

The report says, the EASC Chairman, the director of East and
Southeast Asia Research Centre at Swedish Lunds University
Roger Greatrex was very disappointed at Xu.

He ordered to re-print the torn contents and pointed out it’s
totally unacceptable to intervene in an international conference
hosted by an independent and democratic non-profit academic
organization.”

Wall Street Journal commented that such behavior is very often
seen in 1100 Confucius Institutes in 120 countries.

The report also specifically cited the CCP Politburo Standing
Committee Li Changchun’s speech that Confucius Institute is
an important part of CCP overseas propaganda.

Wall Street Journal suggested US university presidents study
this report and explain publicly why the Confucius Institute
needs to exist.

Zhuichaguoji Exposed the Guilty For the Persecution of Gao
Zhisheng

Gao Zhisheng, renowned mainland human rights lawyer,
is still monitored by CCP police and cannot contact outside
although he was released a few days ago.

August 9, headquartered in New York, International Organization
to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong published a list
of units and people responsible for the persecution of Gao
Zhisheng and requested the Chinese authorities to immediately
restore Gao Zhisheng’ freedom.
Zhuichaguoji hope to expose more individuals and units to
bring these human rights’ violation people to justice.

相關文章
評論
新版即將上線。評論功能暫時關閉。請見諒!