【新唐人2014年06月11日訊】中國大陸演員黃海波，因為嫖娼，在被拘留15天之後，又被轉送「收容教育」六個月，這引起了40多名法学界专家学者以及律师的关注，他
们在6月7号联署〝致人大常委会建议书〞，呼吁〝废止收容教育制度
包括法學泰斗江平、應松年、樊崇義、陳光中等在內的40餘多位法學界專家、學者以及律師，6月7日號聯署「致人大常委會建議書」，呼籲「廢止收容教育制度」。
中國大陸的「收容教育」，是1991年在《全國人民代表大會常務委員會關於嚴禁賣淫嫖娼的決定》中所提出，具體安排則由1993年國務院頒佈的《賣淫嫖娼人員收容教育辦法》確立。
原「全國人大常委會法工委研究室」副主任郭道暉，6月9日號對《新唐人》表示，從法學角度和法治的角度來看，「收容教育」的做法是不對的，它跟「勞動教養」一樣，都是越權立法，也並且由公安機關一家說了算，都是侵犯人權的。
原全國人大常委法工委研究室副主任郭道暉：「要限制人身自由必須是通過法院。不能由公安機關一家說了算。而且這個法規也不是依據立法法的程序來制定的。要限制人身自由的法律或法規，必須是先由法律來制定，而不是由法規，而現在它是個法規。所以它是越權立法。勞動教養既然已經廢除了，同理同一個法律必須同時廢除。」
北京「京都律師事務所」創始合夥人、名譽主任，全國律協刑事專業委員會主任田文昌律師，6月9日號也向《新唐人》表示，「收容教育」制度跟「勞動教養」制度性質很相似。
北京京都律師事務所創始合夥人田文昌：「勞動教養已經廢除了，這個制度沒有廢除，應該就是一個疏漏。而且它的處罰原則是有問題的，沒有經過司法程序，你最根本的問題，沒有經過正當司法程序就限制人的自由，這是有悖於立法原則和立法精神的。」
原「中國政法大學」校長江平表示，「收容教育制度」違反時代潮流。
原中國政法大學校長江平：「因為這個制度已經不合時宜了。」
田文昌表示，「收容教育制度」目前使用不太多，幾乎被人們遺忘記了，法學界也沒有太重視這件事情。而黃海波被送「收容教育」的事情，好像重新引起了大家的關注。
在中國大陸，收容遣送、勞動教養和收容教育，被認為是法外的「三大惡法」，公安可以未經審判，便限制公民的人身自由，從6個月到2年或3年。
2003年，大學畢業生孫志剛，在廣州收容所被打死事件，引發社會輿論上對「收容遣送制度」的大討論。許志永、滕彪和俞江3位法學博士，以及賀衛方、盛洪、蕭瀚等5位著名大陸法學家，先後上書「人大」，要求對「收容遣送制度」進行違憲審查。同年6月，政府正式廢除「收容遣送制度」。
田文昌表示，除了上述的「三大惡法」之外，他記得還有一個「少年教養」的法規有待清理。
田文昌：「所以我們提出來應當對所有這些制度做一個清理。這樣才比較好。凡是不符合立法精神和立法法原則的問題，都應該把它清理掉。」
今年5月4號，包括原全國人大常委會法工委研究室副主任郭道暉、和「北大法學院」教授張千帆在內的一百多位學者、律師和女權工作者等，已經聯合致函人大常委會，要求廢止「收容教育」。
有大陸媒體表示，孫志剛以生命代價讓「收容遣送制度」廢除了，而由「上訪媽媽唐慧」的控告，讓「勞教制度」廢除了，期待黃海波案，能成為一個撬動「收容教育制度」終結的槓桿。
令人憂慮的是，雖然中共當局已經從法律上廢除「勞動教養」和「收容遣送」兩大惡法，但是中共警察仍然使用「洗腦班」和「黑監獄」等非法手段，囚禁「法輪功」信仰者和訪民。郭道暉指出，未經法院審判而限制人身自由，都是侵犯人權，都屬是違法的，應該廢除的。
採訪編輯/秦雪 後製/郭敬
Experts Call For Abolition of Detention for Re-Education
Detention for Re-Education is a new regulation, similar to Re-Education through Labor. It has recently caused legal experts concern as Chinese actor Huang Haibo was thus recently sentenced after a 15-day detention for prostitution. More than 40 Chinese legal experts, signed a joint statement to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPC) demanding an end to Detention for Re-Education.
More than 40 legal professionals sent a joint proposal to the NPC on June 7. Included are leading Chinese experts Jiang Ping, Ying Songnian, Fan Chongyi and Chen Guangzhong. In the proposal, they call for the ending of the system.
This system was proposed in a crackdown on prostitution. It was promulgated in 1993 by the State Council.
Former NPC Legislative Affairs Commission Deputy Director Guo Daohui says the 1993 system like Re-Education through Labor is ultra vires i.e. outside the power of the courts. They are both violations of human rights, said Guo Daohui in an interview with NTD on June 9.
Guo Daohui: “To restrict personal freedom, it must be through the courts. It can not be decided by a public security organ. This regulation did not go through the procedure based on the Law on Legislation. Any law or act to restrict personal freedom must be preceded by law, not the regulation. But now this Re-Education was formulated by regulation. Therefore, it is ultra vires. Since Re-Education through Labor has been abolished, this Detention for Re-Education must be repealed as well."
Tian Wenchang head of Criminal Law Committee of All China Lawyers, says that both systems are similar.
Tian Wenchang: “Re-Education through Labor has been abolished. It is a loophole to continue Detention for Re-Education. Besides, there is a fundamental mistake in this regulation. It allows restriction of personal freedom without due process It violates both the principle and spirit of legislation."
Jiang Ping, former president China University of Political Science and Law, indicates the regulation is against the trend.
Jiang Ping: “Detention for Re-Education is outdated."
Tian Wenchang suggests the system is all but forgotten. It is Huang Haibo’s case that reminded everyone, of the existence of the regulation.
In China, Custody and Repatriation, Re-Education through Labor and Detention for Re-Education, are considered draconian and outside the law. It allows the police to detain civilians without trial for six months to two or three years.
In 2003, college graduate Sun Zhigang, was beaten to death in Guangzhou shelters. The Custody and Repatriation system was thus criticized. Legal experts such as Xu Zhiyong and Teng Biao called for a review of “Custody and Repatriation”, which was abolished in 2013.
Tian Wenchang mentions the Juvenile Reform Schools that also need to be abolished.
Tian Wenchang: “We propose a clean-up of all these. Anything that does not meet the spirit and principles of the Law on Legislation should be cleaned up."
On May 4, more than 100 academics, lawyers and women’s rights workers, jointly addressed the NPC requesting repeal of the Detention for Re-Education system.
Sun Zhigang lost his life to end Custody and Repatriation. Petitioner Tang Hui the abolition of Re-Education through Labor.Maybe Huang Haibo’s case will be the lever to break Detention for Re-Education, Chinese media suggest.
But the ending of these draconian measures has not prevented the police from continuing illegal detention to brainwashing centers and black jails. Numbers of innocent petitioners and Falun Gong practitioners are still subject to random illegal detention. Guo Daohui repeats, restriction of personal freedom without trial, is a violation of human rights and illegal. It ought to be repealed.
Interview & Edit/QinXue Post-Production/GuoJing
