【新唐人2013年03月29日訊】中國大陸《環球時報》網站發表評論文章，指稱：中共新領導人習近平，關於堅持中國特色社會主義道路的內部講話，未能傳達給廣大民眾，導致社會上誤傳曲解不少，需要加強宣傳，以澄清所謂的「是非」。有學者認為，習近平上臺之後，釋放兩種矛盾信號。請看以下報導：
文章作者崑崙岩表示，習近平在十八大後發表一系列有關澄清是非，端正方向的講話，「但由於傳達範圍有限，媒體宣傳很少，廣大黨員幹部和人民群眾想看看不到，想聽聽不到，社會上誤傳曲解不少」。
據國外媒體披露，習近平去年12月在深圳對黨內的講話中，提到蘇聯解體的教訓，他認為，應該由高層推動反腐、和漸進式的經濟改革，但不能動搖中共執政地位。
作者提出四個需釐清的重大問題，包括：當今中國要搞的是甚麼主義？對改革開放前的社會主義歷史能不能否定？今天推進改革發展還要不要堅持實踐標準？共產主義信仰有沒有過時？
作者引用習近平的話，自行推出了答案。
大陸中央民族大學哲學和宗教學系教授趙士林分析說，從習近平的一系列言論來看，他是要搞一種政治對衝。
趙士林：「一方面他要堅持傳統的、正統的意識形態的價值觀。那麼，習近平先生十八大以來，也是非常明確的、鮮明的強調要改革，包括整個新班子，所謂習李新政，非常強調改革，並且反腐敗也有非常堅決的態度。也提出了把權力放到籠子裡、打老虎與打蒼蠅。」
不過，趙士林指出，這些問題的產生，恰好是傳統政治體制和模式下的產物。
趙士林：「我用這個詞叫做政治對衝。我說政治對衝是很危險的遊戲。必須要堅持改革，堅持深化改革，從經濟體制改革到政治體制改革，放棄特殊利益集團的利益，放棄你的一黨私利，真正為中國人民著想，為中華民族著想，那不是不能解決問題。」
那麼，是甚麼原因，造成習近平集兩種矛盾理念於一身呢？
趙士林：「李克強也曾經講過，利益固化的問題要解決，要壯士斷腕。如果僅僅是思想意識問題，沒有這麼嚴重的。這裡面肯定首先是個利益問題。那麼背後很多利益集團，大的小的，他們出於自己的利益，肯定對政治模式、經濟模式，乃至意識形態原則，都有不同要求。」
趙士林表示，這些不同要求不外乎體現為兩大趨勢，一個是維護現有體制，一個是推進改革。趙士林認為，維護現有體制的勢力非常強大，而推進改革也有強烈的呼聲。因此，習近平在這兩方的利益博弈中妥協，才出現了兩種看似矛盾的聲音。
趙士林：「但是呢，老革命家當中有很多開明派，習仲勳是比較開明的改革開放，他的姿態也一直是比較開明的。這樣一些因素，再加上時代的因素，肯定能影響到習近平，所以說，這樣一些因素，從觀念的角度、從思維的角度、也糾結到他一個人身上。」
有關外媒報導的習近平內部講話，是否存在﹖趙士林表示，他無法確認。而原中國政法大學校長江平也表示，他沒有看過相關內容。
原中國政法大學校長江平：「沒有沒有，我沒有見過。我也沒有看到網站，因為我也不上網。」
北京獨立學者章立凡向媒體指出，中國大陸的左派人士從習近平的講話中得出，他擁護馬列主義、和毛澤東思想的結論。右派同時也抓住習近平所講的：「把權力關進制度的籠子裏」等。章立凡說：左右兩派都在習近平的講話中取得了自己想要的東西，當局要的就是這個效果。
採訪編輯/秦雪 後製/薛莉
Leftists Threaten Xi Raising Four Questions
The Chinese “Global Times” has published a commentary
on line, in which it is alleged that in a recent speech,
Xi Jinping speaks about adhering to socialism with
Chinese characteristics,
these remarks have not been published for fear of
arousal of misunderstandings and rumors.
A propaganda that should be formed which can clarify
the difference between “right and wrong”.
Some scholars thought that there were two contradictory
signals released by Xi Jinping after taking power.
Let’s see the following report!
Kunlun Rock, author of the article, said that Xi Jinping
has delivered a series of speeches that focus on
“clarifying right and wrong, correcting direction”,
Rock continues: “but distribution is very limited,
and the media hasn’t reported much on it. ….
There are many misunderstandings and rumors going round
because most of the CCP’s officials and the public haven’t yet seen it although they have wanted to.”
It has been revealed by foreign media that Xi Jinping made
mention of the lessons of the collapse of the Soviet Union
when he spoke for the CCP in Shenzhen in last December.
He thought that the senior level should promote an
anti-corruption reform and a gradual economic reform,
but that the reforms shouldn’t shake the CCP’s ruling position.
The author raised “four questions that need to be clarified”,
including: which kind of doctrine does China engage in?
Whether to deny socialist history before the
Reform and Opening Up?
Whether today’s reform and development
needs to adhere to practice standards?
Whether belief in communism is out of date?
The author answered all the questions by quoting
Xi Jinping’s own words.
Zhang Shilin, professor from the Philosophy and Religion
Division of China Central University for Nationalities
analyzed that Xi is going to make a “political hedge “
with his words.
Zhang Shilin: “On the one hand, he wants to adhere to
traditional, orthodox ideological values.
Xi then emphasizes very firmly and clearly that reform
will be needed after the 18th National Congress.
The new leaders of the Xi-Li leadership emphasize reform,
and have a very strong stance on corruption.
They are also required to detain power inside a cage,
to fight the tigers and the flies.”
However, Zhao Shilin pointed out that all these questions
are generated by the traditional political system and modes.
Zhao Shilin: “I call this Political Hedge.
The political hedge is a very dangerous game.
It must adhere to the reform, deepen the reform,
from the economic reform to the political reform must
give up the interests of the special groups and the Party,
must really think about the people, and about China
as a nation, then it will solve the problem.”
Then what is the reason causing Xi to have
these two contradictory ideas?
Zhao Shilin: ”Li Keqiang also said that it should solve
the issue of the fixed interests’ distribution system by the words 『hero cuts the wrist’.
If it’s only an ideological question, it won’t be that serious.
There’s an issue of interests. There are many interest groups,
big or small, behind everything.
They have different requests for the political mode,
economy mode, even wanting ideological principles to protect their benefits.”
Zhao Shilin said that those different requests
were showing two trends:
one is to maintain the current system,
and the other is to promote reform.
Zhao Shilin thinks that the power group wanting
to maintain the current system is very strong,
but there are also strong voices asking for reform.
Xi has compromised with these two groups and
that’s the reason why he spoke in self contradiction.
Zhao Shilin: “However, there are some liberals among the old
revolutionaries, who are like Xi Zhongxun (father of Xi Jinping).
He is a relative liberal and supports reform and opening up.
Xi Jinping was impacted by these facts and
by the forces of the times.
So I say that from the conceptual point and
perspective, these facts will effect Xi Jinping.”
Whether the internal speeches of Xi Jinping that
were reported by the foreign media existed or not?
Zhao Shilin said that he couldn’t confirm it
one way or another.
Meanwhile Jiang Ping, former president of
“China University of Political Science and Law”,
said he hasn’t received related information.
Jiang Ping: “No. No. I have never seen it.
I have never seen it on line, because I don’t surf the internet.”
Zhang Lifan, a Beijing independent scholar, told media that
the leftists in Mainland China heard that Xi Jinping champions
Marxism-Leninism, and Mao Zedong Thought in his words.
The rightists also caught Xi’s points made such as:
“detain power inside a cage”.
Zhang Lifan said that both leftists and rightists had
found the meanings that they wanted, which was
the result hoped for by the authorities.
