【新唐人2013年01月10日訊】新京報「抗旨」未遂 網站刊文表不滿
「南周事件」引發的風暴繼續發酵，外界關注的焦點已經從南轉到北。據北京《新京報》記者通過微博發佈的消息，1月8號，《新京報》因抗拒中共中宣部的命令，拒絕轉載《環球時報》批評南周事件的社評，遭到北京市委宣傳部副部長嚴力強上門施壓，以解散報社要挾，強令《新京報》刊登，社長戴自更口頭辭職抗爭沒有結果。1月9號，《新京報》以新聞消息形式，還是轉載了《環時》的社評。
但是，《新京報》網站主頁卻同時刊出一篇題為《南方的粥》文章，內容說﹕「一碗熱滾滾的砂鍋粥,來自南方大地，它似乎也有一顆勇敢的心，在寒冷的夜裡…」文章內容被外界認為，擺明與《南周》同進退的姿態。
《瀟湘》刊滅害廣告 惡搞環時社評
與《新京報》一樣被迫轉載《環球時報》社評的《瀟湘晨報》，也以自己的獨特方式表達不滿和不屈。
1月9號，《瀟湘晨報》在轉載《環時》社評的版面上，同時刊登巨幅廣告，廣告詞為：撥打96360，訂購除蟲滅害服務，「殺光」為止。諷刺和不滿溢於版面。
美媒：南周事件刮花中共親和形象
美國《華爾街日報》1月9號也針對南周事件發表評論說，「南周事件」更大的意義，在於反映了中國的傳媒，以至整個社會，都越來越難以順服於一個一黨專政的制度。
評論最後指出，擁有一切資源的黨，可以遏制異見者，而在這場風波中，也許仍將如此，除非發生一場當局難以控制的全國性的反傳媒審查運動。而無論事件如何收場，這只會再一次刮花中共向國內外所宣示的「一個快樂而親和的形象」。
英媒：中共拋薄案轉移視線
英國《電訊報》1月9號報導，中共喉舌《新華社》當天發出快電，以一種典型的模糊方式，對薄熙來的「嚴重違法案件」發出公告，文章暗示，薄熙來庭審的日子已臨近，但並沒有透露審判日期或審判地點，或任何進一步的細節。
《電訊報》說，網上傳言說，那個公告只是一個詭計，旨在轉移媒體的視線，因為現在，發生在中國南部的有關新聞自由的抗議活動已經進行了三天。
編輯/周玉林
Beijing News Publisher Refused Chinese Communist
Party (CCP) Order In Vain
Southern Weekly incident increasingly intensified,
triggering the focus from South to North.
Beijing News newspaper (BJ News) posted news on microblog
that, on Jan. 8th BJ News refused to follow orders from the
CCP Propaganda Department and refused to repost
Global Times editorial article criticizing Southern Weekly.
Yan Liqiang, vice minister of the propaganda department
of Beijing City arrived to enforce it.
He threatened to shut down BJ News if they didn’t listen and
forced them to reprint the Global Times article.
Dai Zigeng, the publisher of BJ News verbally refused to
obey the order, but in vain.
On Jan. 9th BJ News reposted Global Times editorial article.
Meanwhile, BJ News published the article
“Southern Porridge” on the front page.
It read: “A bowl of hot porridge from the southern land,
showing a brave heart during the chilly night…”
Outsiders interpreted that the article declared to stand
by Southern Weekly.
Xiaoxiang Morning Herald’s Advert Against
Global Times Editorial Article
Xiaoxiang Morning Herald encountered the same problem
as BJ News did, which was to forcibly repost Global News editorial article.
However, they used their own way to express their anger.
On Jan. 9th Xiaoxiang Morning Herald put a large advert on
the same page as the reposted Global Times editorial article.
The advert: Call 96360, order kill pest control service.
until its all dead. Dissatisfaction was ironically expressed.
US media: Southern Weekly Incident Scratch
Communist’s Face
On Jan. 9th the Wall Street Journal commented on
the Southern Weekly incident.
It said that the Southern Weekly incident’s greater
significance is to reflect the media.
The whole society is finding it more difficult to follow
one-party dictatorship system.
The article concluded that owning every resource,
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can suppress dissidents.
Unless there is a national movement against press Censorship
which is not under CCP control, everything will be the same.
No matter how the incident ends up, it scratches the CCP’s
face who draws itself as the image of happiness and harmony.
British Media: Xinhua News On Bo Xilai Trial
Diverts Attention
On Jan. 9th UK’s Telegraph newspaper reported the Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) media, Xinhua news agency briefly
mentioned Bo Xilai’s “Serious law violation case”.
Xinhua hinted that Bo’s day in court was approaching, but
failed to give a date, location for the trial or any other details.
The Telegraph said that there was speculation online, saying
that Xinhua’s announcement was simply a ruse.
Its purpose is to divert media attention.
An ongoing row over press protests has now been held
for three days in southeast China.
