【新唐人2012年12月29日訊】12月27號，中共河南省委機關報《河南日報》在頭版社評位置發表文章，批判此前在微博上，反對河南省發起平墳運動的趙克羅。據了解，趙克羅是河南政協常委，是所謂八個「民主黨派」之一的民革成員。而就在3天前，中共新任總書記習近平剛剛強調，要加強多黨合作。在這個時候《河南日報》猛批趙克羅，難道是要公開和習近平作對嗎？
《河南日報》發表的題為《理性對待 凝聚共識》的文章聲稱，趙克羅隨意在網上發佈「不當言論」，甚至質疑中國共產黨領導下的「多黨合作制」，以政治話語暗含殺機，對個人進行攻擊，是自89年以後，在中國地方政治中罕見的。
今年5月，趙克羅實名發佈微博，炮轟南陽市集中整治墓葬的行動，指責當地只剷平民祖墳，卻不動「副處級祖墳」。趙克羅的言論，引發外界對河南當局強烈的輿論批評，11月份，河南平墳運動被迫擱淺。
12月17號，趙克羅實名發佈《一個省政協常委的懺悔書》。文中提到，得知自己下一屆「省政協委員及常委的提名被拿掉」，「因為在南陽平墳事件中，給領導添了亂」。
他「懺悔」道：原認為自己是政協委員，有權對政府進行民主監督。「我是太天真太幼稚了」。
趙克羅是河南一家註冊會計師行的負責人、所謂八個「民主黨派」之一的民革成員，並以「新階層人士」成為省政協常委。
《北京之春》雜誌主編胡平在接受《新唐人》採訪時表示，共產黨的所謂「多黨合作」，本來就是欺人之談。
《北京之春》雜誌主編胡平：「這些所謂的民主黨本來就是附庸，一個花瓶的角色，但是，口頭上中共領導人還是時不時要講一講，希望其他的民主黨派也參政議政，但是，如果真的有民主黨派把這件事情當起真的來了，那麼對共產黨來說，它又會不高興，它就要去打壓了。」
趙克羅在網絡上質疑，「身為河南省政協常委，依中國政協章程進行政治協商，民主監督，參政議政，履行委員的權力和義務。身為中國註冊會計師，從事社會審計監督，恪守獨立、客觀、公正執業道德底線。我何錯之有？」
對此，網絡作家吳建國認為，大多數所謂的「民主黨派」人士，都是中共安插進去為中共服務的。當然也有少數異己人士，被中共拖進「民主黨派」，而這些人士就很可能會打橫炮，不按中共的規則出牌。
吳建國：「這個趙克羅現象的新奇點，就在於人類社會已經進入網絡時代，中共的國家機器，已經很難控制網絡媒體，但是，他這個政協常委，卻反而要受到壓制。說白了，你是做花瓶的，你應該遵守做花瓶的職責，不能跨越做花瓶的職責去指責政府的工作。」
近日，趙克羅又在微博上發了一條「遺書」，引起了網友的圍觀，被轉發五萬多次。趙克羅在遺書中說：「在我已經被拿掉河南省政協常委情況下，我已獲悉，他們將對我繼續打擊報復，在河南省內層面上，我已無能為力，該來的就來吧！我等著，我已做好殺身成仁的準備！」
12月24號和25號，習近平走訪了各民主黨派中央和全國工商聯，併進行了座談，習近平強調，要堅持和發展多黨合作。
時隔不到三天，12月27號，《河南日報》就在頭版社評位置大批趙克羅。外界揣測，《河南日報》是有意還是疏忽，竟然在這個時候高調批評民主黨派人士，這不明擺著，在和習近平對著幹嗎？
胡平：「媒體當然就是扮演打手，一方面共產黨它們害怕的就是這種樣子，因為表面上它不能不說那些客套話，就像它表面上必須得承認，中國的公民有這個權利，那個權利，但是你一旦擁有起來呢，就又要打擊你，給你扣帽子，給你橫加罪名。」
胡平建議，在這種情況下，我們應該對扮演打手的媒體，要痛加批評，鼓勵更多的人站出來維護他們自己的權利。
採訪編輯/常春 後製/王明宇
Henan Daily Confronting Xi Jin Ping?
On December 27, the official newspaper “Henan Daily”
published an article in a front page editorial,
in which it criticized Zhao Keluo who, against the provincial
government launched a “leveled tomb movement” online.
Zhao Keluo is member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
Henan Political Consultative Conference,
He is also a member of the Revolutionary Committee Of
the Chinese Kuomintang which is one of the eight so-called “democratic parties” in China.
Three days ago, the new CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping
stressed that the CCP should enhance multi-party cooperation.
Now that the Henan Daily has criticized Zhao Keluo heavily,
does it not confront Xi Jinping openly?
The Henan Daily published an article titled
“Treat Rationally, Assemble the Consensus”.
The article said Zhao Keluo had published
“improper words” online.
The article also questioned the CCP’s
“multi-party cooperation” in a political tone.
The article attacked an individual
which is rare in China’s local politics after 1989.
In May, Zhao Keluo used his real name and published
a microblog which challenged the movement that
the CCP’s Nanyang City government had leveled tombs.
He criticized that the local government had only leveled
tombs of ordinary families,
but didn’t touch the tombs of officers’ families
whose levels are higher than deputy director.
Zhao Keluo’s words have triggered a strong
public discussion
which criticizes the Henan authorities. In November,
the Leveled Tomb Movement has been forced to stop.
On December 17, Zhao Keluo published “A CCP Political
Consultative Conference Member’s Confession Letter”.
In the article, he said he “was removed from the candidates
list of the next Henan Political Consultative Conference”,
“because he had made trouble for the leadership
over the Nanyang leveled tomb movement case”.
He confessed he thought that he, as a member of
the Political Consultative Conference , should have the
right to do democratic supervision, but “ I was too naïve.”
Zhao Keluo is a director of a registered accounting firm,
and a member of the Revolutionary Committee Of
the Chinese Kuomintang which is one of the so-called eight “democratic parties”.
He entered the Political Consultative Conference
as a “new level personage”.
Hu Ping, the chief editor of “Beijing Spring" magazine
told NTD that CCP’s so-called “multi-party cooperation” is just deceptive talk.
Hu Ping: ”These so-called democratic parties are vassals.
They are acting as vassals, which means the CCP leaders
can say that democratic parties are welcome to be involved in politics,
but if the parties really do it,
the CCP will be unhappy and will suppress them.”
Zhao Keluo commented online, “As a member of
CCP Henan Political Consultative Conference,
I have the right and obligation to do political consultation,
democratic supervision,
and to be involved in policy discussion, all of which
are defined by articles of CPPCC association.
As a China registered accountant, I should be engaged
in social audit supervision, assist on independence,
objective and judicial practicing projects.
What have I done wrong?”
In this regard, Wu Jianguo, a network writer, thinks that
most of the so-called democratic parties’ members
are arranged by and working for the CCP.
Of course, a small number of them are dragged into
the “democratic“ parties,
in which position they can watch for actions or thinking that
doesn’t match the CCP’s policy, or for “wrong cards“ being played.
Wu Jianguo: “The interesting point of Zhao Keluo case
is that human society has entered the internet age,
it’s hard for the CCP’s state apparatus to control net media.
As a member of CPPCC, Zhao was suppressed.
It shows that Zhao is a vassal of the CCP,
he has to follow the game policy made by the CCP.
He can’t do anything that shouldn’t be done by a vassal.”
Recently, Zhao Keluo published a “suicide note" online,
which attracted the interest of netizens, and was forwarded more than 50,000 times.
Zhao Keluo said in the suicide note,
”After I had been removed from the membership of CPPCC,
I was told that they will monitor me continually.
On a provincial level, I have no solution to protect myself.
Let the retribution come!
I will wait, and I am prepared for death.”
On December 24 and 25, Xi Jinping visited the headquarters
of each of the democratic parties, and the National Federation of Industry and Commerce.
Xi stressed the importance of meetings that will
consist of and develop multi-party cooperation.
In a little less than three days, the Henan Daily published an
article on the front-page on December 27 criticizing Zhao Keluo.
The leading article discussed whether it was intentional or
negligence, that the Henan Daily had criticized a democratic person in high profile?
Does it look like a direct confrontation with Xi Jinping himself?
Hu Ping: “Of course, the media is a hired thug in China.
On the one hand, the CCP is afraid of this situation
because it has to speak politely on the surface.
This is like it admits that Chinese citizens have rights
but it will suppress those citizens all the same,
and will name you a criminal if you really
try to exercise those rights.“
Hu Ping suggests that in this situation, we should
criticize the media which has acted as a hired thug.
We should encourage more people to stand up
and protect their rights.
