【新唐人2012年12月21日訊】「中國社會科學院」日前發佈了第二部「反腐藍皮書」，指稱中國腐敗花樣層出不窮，反腐形勢嚴峻。但藍皮書表示，近60%的中國城鄉居民，對今後5到10年的中國反腐敗工作，取得明顯成效有信心。不過，民間的真實感受卻有不同。來聽聽他們怎麼說。
「中國社會科學院」經過對各行業人士的調查問卷，12月19號在北京發佈《中國反腐倡廉建設報告No.2》，報告說，2011年，全國紀檢監察機關共處分縣處級以上幹部4843人，追回財產84.4億元。
藍皮書指出：「在全球化背景下，資源、資金、文化、信息等都在跨國快速流動或整合，藉助現代信息技術條件，腐敗的表現形式也發生了新的變化，比如：腐敗主體從個體向集團化蔓延，窩案串案較嚴重；腐敗手段從顯性向隱性擴展，曲線收錢、迂迴斂財、花樣翻新。」
但藍皮書聲稱，近60%的中國城鄉居民，對今後5到10年的中國反腐敗工作，取得明顯成效有信心。這與2011年相比大體持平，略有上升。
因實名舉報腐敗而受到打壓的天津張姓市民表示，中國社會的腐敗已經無法控制，現在各行各業都有潛規則，官員都在變相洗錢，社科院的資料不可信。
天津市民張先生：「我舉報也是向中紀委多次反映，沒有用，他連信兒都不給你回，它連屁都不放。就如同現在訪民受了冤屈一樣，你看看拆遷暴力，那個警察作惡打死、打傷的那些訪民們去北京告狀，有用嗎？沒有用。為甚麼沒有用啊，兒子作惡了，你上他作惡的老子去告狀，那能告的贏嗎？」
張先生質疑，中共現在連官員的財產都不敢公布，是真心反腐嗎？他說，中共反腐只是作秀，這就是為甚麼最近20年來，當局越反腐越腐敗的原因。
民間反貪人士、上海律師鄭恩寵夫婦日前遭到警方傳喚。鄭恩寵認為，警方傳喚與他連署要求官員財產公示有關。
「德先生研究所」北京成員、律師李景林也指出，「中國社科院反腐藍皮書」的結論，「不具備真實性和權威性」。民間法律工作者李向陽也不讚同「藍皮書」的說法。他認為，中國共產黨的反腐倡廉還是換湯不換藥，既用貪官，又殺貪官，根本不能治標又治本。
雖然，「十八大」後一批高官落馬，而且，中共媒體透露，在層出不窮的腐敗新表現中，「美容會所成貪污高發地」，北京就有12名女性官員因此落馬。報導同時指出，這種新型的「美容腐敗」潮流極具隱蔽性。但是，日前，學者呼籲，反腐「不只三把火」，要燒更多火，中共新任中紀委書記王岐山回應說，更希望的是「潤物細無聲，不大搞動靜」。
北京「佳法律師事務所」民權律師蘭志學認為，從當局動作來看，還是「維穩壓倒一切」的思路，無力反腐。
民權律師蘭志學：「這種靠一個執政黨自身來反對腐敗，這本身就存在一個問題：自己監督自己、自己反對自己的腐敗。反腐還得靠制度，得有一個健全的制度，得有科學化的、民主化的、人權化的這種監督機制。」
天津張姓市民還認為，很多高官之所以被揭露出來，是內部利益集團爭鬥的結果。他認為，反腐需從開放黨禁、報禁做起。
蘭志學也指出，真正反腐，需要老百姓參與，需要媒體參與。但目前連對言論自由、公民表達權的限制都不解除，就讓大家強迫相信他們反腐有力度，這很難說服人。
張先生認為，只有廢除一黨專專制，反腐才有希望，才能從根本上解決問題。
採訪/朱智善 編輯/宋風 後製/肖顏
China’s Blue Book Anti-corruption Efficacy Questioned
China’s Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) recently
released the second part of the anti-corruption Blue Book.
It claims, the corruption take many shapes and forms,
and the situation is critical.
The Blue Book shows that nearly 60% of the Chinese urban
and rural residents, have obvious confidence in the anti-corruption work of the last 5 years.
However, the true feelings of the people are not the same.
Let’s take a look at the report.
CASS released ‘China Anti-corruption Construction Report
No.2’ on December 19th, after a questionnaire investigation of people in all industries.
The report says, in 2011, the national discipline inspection
organs sanctioned 4843 county level cadres or above, and recovered a property of 8,44 billion Yuan.
The Blue Book says: ‘In the context of globalization,
ressources, finance, culture, information, etc.,
are all fast-moving multi-nationally, or integrating,
through the modern information technology.
The manifestations of corruption also changed, for example:
the corruption spreads from individuals to groups;
corrupt means changed from dominant to recessive,
circuitously extorting money, etc.’
However, the Blue Book claims that nearly 60% of Chinese
urban and rural residents have obvious confidence in the anti-corruption work of the last 5 years.
This is roughly the same as 2011,
with a slight increase.
Mr. Zhang, from Tianjin, was suppressed,
because of reporting corruption using his real name.
Mr. Zhang said, the corruption of the Chinese society
is impossible to control.
Now, in every industry there are unspoken rules,
officials are all laundering money in disguised forms, and CASS’ information is not reliable.
Mr. Zhang (Tianjin resident): “I reported several times to the
Central Commission for Discipline Inspection – it is useless, they do not even reply.
It is like the petitioners going to Beijing, who suffer from
violent demolitions and end up with the evil policemen killing and beating them, does it work?
It does not work. Why? Because the son has done evil, you
complain to the father, who also does evil, how can it work?”
Mr. Zhang asks, CCP (China’s Communist Party) even dare
not publish officials’ properties, is this anti-corruption real?
He said, the CCP is just putting up a show.
Thus, for the last 20 years, the more anti-corruption work
authorities claim, the more corrupted the society becomes.
The non-government anti-corruption lawyer from Shanghai
Zheng Enchong and his wife were summoned by the police.
Zheng believes, this is related to his petition,
requesting the publishing of the officials’ properties.
Member of ‘Mr. D Institute’ and Beijing lawyer Li Jinglin
pointed out, the conclusions of CASS’ Blue Book ‘do not have the necessary authenticity and authority.’
Li Xiangyang, who works in the field of Law,
also does not agree with the arguments in the Blue Book.
He thinks, CCP’s anti-corruption work is the same as before,
they use corrupted officials to punish corrupted officials, this cannot solve the problem from its roots.
After the 18th CCP congress,
many senior officials were dismissed.
CCP’s media revealed, among the endless corruption string,
‘the beauty club has developed into high corruption place.’
In Beijing, 12 female officials were sacked,
because of this.
This new form of ‘beauty corruption’
is fashionable and invisible, the repost says.
However, scholars have called for more motivation,
when implementing anti-corruption measures,
The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection’ secretary
Wang Qishan hopes that anti-corruption will not turn into a big movement.
Beijing ‘Jiafa Law Firm’ lawyer Lan Zhixue believes,
the authorities measures are still part of the routine for ‘maintaining stability,’ as they can’t fight corruption.
Lan Zhixue: “As a ruling party it can’t fight corruption,
since it monitors itself, it has to fight its own corruption.
Anti-corruption has to rely on external systems. There must
be sound systems, scientific, democratic, human rights, etc., to implement and oversee the mechanism.”
Mr. Zhang also believes, many senior officials were exposed
only because of internal interests groups’ fights.
He thinks, anti-corruption should start with opening up
the party and the censorship.
Lan Zhixue also points out that the real anti-corruption
needs the participation of the public and the media.
Now even the freedom of speech,
and the basic civil right of expression are restricted.
It is difficult to convince people,
that the anti-corruption measures are effective.
Mr. Zhang believes, only through abolishing the one-party
authority can there be a hope for anti-corruption measures, that can solve the problem fundamentally.
