【新唐人2012年9月7日訊】環球時報炮轟王立軍「屁股不乾淨」
王立軍在5號被提起公訴後，中共喉舌《環球時報》發表署名單仁平的評論文章，標題為《離奇的案發情節，確定的司法正義》。
文章開篇直接炮轟王立軍，說，「作為重慶市原副市長、公安局原局長，出事後被查出屁股如此不乾淨，真是令人悲哀。」文章還聲稱，「王立軍是後來薄谷開來案件等『拔出蘿蔔帶出泥』的那個『蘿蔔』」，是「中國前進路上的一個醜聞」而且「越來越不會有人去捂。」
一系列所謂的嚴詞狂轟後，文章又把矛盾轉向美國。文章說，美國駐華使領館做不了犯案官員的庇護所，決定不了中國公民的命運和未來。文章告誡，中共官員出了事就往美國使領館跑，是不光彩的。
作者單仁平最後還是暴露出了「司馬昭之心」，文章寫道：中國人現在對王立軍案本身已經不太關心了，如何判決是王個人命運。中國已經邁過了王案的政治波瀾，中國在向前走去。
網友則一針見血的說，一個以說假話著稱的媒體，屁股也不太可能乾淨。假設現在還不到最髒，那也是機會還不到。機會一到，恐怕比薄王還髒呢。
港媒：王立軍案審理可能不公開
王立軍案件是否會公開審理是外界一直所關注的。香港《中通社》預測，王立軍案可能不會公開審理。
中通社6號引述多位法學專家的觀點表示，根據法律規定，叛逃罪和濫用職權罪可能與國家機密相關，因此王立軍案可能不會公開審理或公布細節，但會在近期宣判。
不過也有專家表示，比照谷開來案子，宣判結果及構成罪名的一些細節會在第一時間對外公布。
從量刑來看，專家表示，叛逃罪最高可判5到10年有期徒刑。而涉嫌受賄罪，則有可能面臨重刑，情節特別嚴重的，可處死刑。
梁光烈印度賞紅包 被轟外交失態
前往印度訪問的中共國防部長梁光烈出了個大醜。印度媒體報導，3號，梁光烈對接待他從孟買飛到新德里的兩名印度空軍飛行員，送出每人各5萬盧比，大約900美元的紅包，說要答謝他們。
梁光烈用現金紅包犒賞印度飛行官的舉動，在印度引發輿論批評。印度媒體譏諷他「外交失態」，更懷疑有「隱含訊息」。大陸網友則嘲諷說：「真是丟臉丟到國外去了！居然把行賄受賄的惡習發揚到國外去了，厲害！」
上海五千民眾聚集信訪辦維權
上海，9月5號上午，人民大道200號聚集了5千多名民眾舉行抗議活動。這裡是上海人大、市委、市人民政府信訪辦。
《維權網》報導，抗議活動從早上8點開始，警方在11點出動了幾百人來驅趕民眾。不過，抗議人群對警察毫不理會，繼續維權示威，警察也不敢強為，只在一旁嚴密監控。一直到下午5點，抗議的民眾全部離開。
編輯/李靜
Global Times Criticized Wang Lijun.
Wang Lijun was indicted on September 5.
Chinese Communist Party (CCP) mouthpiece, Global Times,
published an article titled “Bizarre Case, Determined Justice."
The beginning of the article directly criticized Wang Lijun:
“As a former vice mayor and former Director of the Public
Security Bureau of Chongqing, Wang Lijun was linked to many sordid things."
The article also claims,
“Wang Lijun is the key to Gu Kailai’s case.
It’s a scandal in China’s march forward,
and no one will cover it any more."
After a series of stern criticism,
the article turned on to the US.
The article commented that the US embassy and consulates
shouldn’t be shelters for criminal officials, nor decide the fate and future of the Chinese citizens.
The article warned CCP officials not to run to US embassies
or consulates when their crimes are exposed, ‘it’s disgraceful.’
And last, the author also exposed his sinister intentions.
The article expressed that Chinese people weren’t concerned
about the Wang Lijun case, nor, the trial or Wang’s fate.
China has gone through the political waves of Wang’s case,
and China has moved forward.
Netizens pointed out that the media is aware of its own lies.
The genuine facts are not being exposed.
Netizens comment that when the media is exposed
perhaps its laundry will be dirtier than that of Wang Lijun.
Hong Kong media: Wang Lijun’s Trial Can’t Be Open
The public trial of the Wang Lijun case has attracted
much attention from the outside world.
Hong Kong’s Newswire forecasted
that Wang Lijun’s case may not be entirely public.
On September 6, Newswire quoted the views of many legal
experts who said the defection and the authority abuse may be related to national secrets.
So Wang Lijun’s case may not be entirely public,
or announce all the details.
However, Wang’s sentenced will be announced
in the near future.
Some experts also think that as in Gu’s case, offense’details
will be announced for the first time after the sentencing.
Analysts believe that the defection itself will result
in a maximum sentence of 5-10 years in prison.
However, Wang is suspected of accepting bribes,
which most likely will lead to heavyer penalty.
Furthermore, considering how serious his overall situation is,
he might even face the death penalty.
China’s Defense Minister In A “Diplomatic Gaffe”
Chinese Defense Minister Liang Guanglie is caught up
in a scandal from his visit to India.
Indian media reports that on September 3, Liang Guanglie
gave red envelopes to two Indian pilots who flew him from Mumbai to Delhi.
The red envelopes contained 50,000 rupees each,
about USD900.
Liang Guanglie’s gift led to public criticism in India.
Indian media ridiculed his “diplomatic gaffe",
even suspected its “implied message."
Minland netizen commented on the issue: ‘What a shame, in
a foreign country! Carrying the bad habit of bribery abroad!’
Over 5,000 Protesters Gathered in Shanghai
In Shanghai, on the morning of September 5,
more than 5,000 people held a protest.
Here is the Shanghai People’s Congress, the Municipal Party
Committee and Municipal Government Petition Office.
“Human Rights Defenders reported
that the protest started from 8:00AM.
At 11:00AM, hundreds of police were mobilized
to drive away the people.
The protesters, however, took no notice of the police
and continued their rights demonstration.
The police closely monitored the protestors.
The protest concluded around 5:00PM.
