【新唐人2012年3月6日訊】正在北京召開的中共人大、政協兩會，除了吸引全球媒體的目光外，中國大陸的百姓也身不由己的被迫關注。
由於開兩會而實行的種種限制措施，嚴重干擾了民眾的生活，兩會因此而被稱為“擾民大會”。尤其是北京的市民，連最基本的出行都受到嚴重影響，紛紛抱怨“兩會交通災難”使他們上學、上班遲到，開車油耗增加。兩會期間還限制小販、限制外地車輛、限制微博發言等等，使北京市民不堪其擾，很多人上網呼籲，要麽取消“擾民大會”、要麽遷到邊遠地區去開。
讓大陸民眾不滿的，還有兩會代表的身份，他們認為，兩會代表非富即貴、貪官多，只代表權貴利益，並不代表“人民”，是官商貴族的派對。還有網民反映兩會代表多“外國人”，說：“開兩會在坐的不是外國人，就是外國人的爸媽。”呼籲核查並公開代表國籍，並諷刺：“嚴防外國人干預中國內政！”也有網友說，這才是真正的“非法集會”。
兩會官員的講話，也是民眾嘲笑的對像，除了溫家寶的政府工作報告被譏諷為“開中藥鋪”，兩會的記者會也被網友譏笑：“凡是混混沌沌回答的，定是民生話題；凡是口氣強硬回答的，定是維穩話題；凡是底氣不足回答的，定是外交話題；凡是閃爍其詞回答的，定是政改話題；凡是裝作沒聽見不回答的，定是三公消費和官員財産公開話題。”
兩會奢侈的花費，更讓大陸民眾憤怒。據網上公布的數據，兩會代表3000，記者3000，安保人員739000，服務員若干。網友總結說，平均248人伺候一名代表去舉手、鼓掌、睡覺。有人質問，每年兩會會費到底有多少？甚麼時候能公開？取得了甚麽效果？如果把數以億計的會費投在教育、醫保、低保、就業方面，中國會怎麼樣？
In Beijing, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s
two sessions, People’s Congresses and
Political Consultative Conference,
has attracted the attention of global media.
People in mainland China are themselves also
obliged to take interest, as they are inconvenienced in a big way.
Because various restrictions implemented for the
two sessions are seriously interfering with peoples lives,
the two sessions are called as the
“disturbing-people General Assembly”.
Especially for Beijing citizens, as even their most basic travel
arrangements are severely affected.
They complain that the “two session traffic disaster"
makes them late for school and work,
and makes the fuel consumption of their cars increase.
During the two sessions, there are restrictions to hawkers,
foreign vehicles, speeches in micro-blogging and so on.
These restrictions are hard for Beijing’s citizens to take.
Many people complain online that the “disturbing-people
General Assembly” should either be canceled,
or be moved and held in remote areas away from the capital.
What makes people dissatisfied also includes
the status of the two-session representatives.
They think that the representatives of the two sessions are
either rich or powerful, with many being corrupt officials.
They only represent the interests of powerful people at the top,
but not of the people. It’s a party of officials, businessmen and aristocrats.
The netizens also reflect on the fact that most of the
representatives of the two sessions are “foreigners”,
saying: “The representatives of the two sessions are either
foreigners or the parents of foreigners.”
The netizens appeal for the nationalities of the representatives
to be verified and publicized.
They mock: “Foreigners are prevented from interfering with
China’s internal affairs!”
Netizens also say that this is the real “illegal assembly".
The officials’ speeches in the two sessions are also
the objects of public ridicule.
In addition to Wen Jiabao’s government work report
which is derided as “running a Chinese pharmacy",
the report on the conference of the two sessions
is satirized by netizens:
“All those with vague answers must be
on the topic of people’s livelihood.
All those with tough answers must be
on the topic of maintaining stability.
All those with lack of confident answers must be
on the topic of diplomacy.
All those with evasive answers must be
on the topic of political reform.
All those without answers and from those who pretend not
to hear must be
on the topic of officials’ three big consumptions and
of openness on property details.”
The luxury spending on two Sessions leaves the public
furious. According to data published on the internet,
there are 3000 representatives, 3000 journalists, 739000 security
guards and many service staff who work for two sessions”.
Netizens concluded that there are on average 248 people
to serve one representative.
People have questioned how much in fees has been spent on
two Sessions each year? When can this figure be made public?
If these fees, which cost hundreds of millions yuan,
were to be used on education, healthcare,
the minimum living fund and employment,
What improvement would be visible in China’s situation?
